Who Are We?
What We've Written
Links
- Interesting Reading
- Martha and her Monthly
- Alberta -- The Details
- Freddie's Diary
- Bill Barley
- Vive le Canada
- Blogs Canada
- Alberta Blogs
- Seniors
- Healthcare
- Education
- Insurance
- Provincial Parties
- The Premier's Page
- The Liberal Opposition
- The Alberta New Democrats
- Alberta Social Credit Party
- Alberta Alliance
- Alberta Greens
- Find and E-mail Your MLA
- Consumer Information
Archives
- July 2003
- August 2003
- September 2003
- October 2003
- November 2003
- December 2003
- January 2004
- February 2004
- March 2004
- April 2004
- May 2004
- June 2004
- July 2004
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- January 2007
Check out previous postings
By Topic - Click Here
By Date - See Below
What's Your Political Stripe
- Are you more like George Bush or Nelson Mandella? Pope Jean Paul II or the Dalai Lama? Take a 5 minute test and find out where you fit. Email me your results if you want along with which Alberta Party you support today; PC, Liberal or NDP. I'll compile the results and post them here; anonymously of course.
- Take the test at:The Political Compass.
Send us mail
- Let us know if you have any comments to contribute. If you find any interesting sites we would be glad to add them to the list. We'll post your comments with or without your name if we think they are appropriate. If you want your name used, please say so in your e-mail or it won't be used. We will never post your e-mail address. Hope to hear from you and hope you enjoy Ralph's World.
Ralph Klein has gone and it is time to retire Ralph's World. Thanks to all of you who have supported this venture by contributing material and through your comments. It has been fun.
Should we get another blog underway? Let me know your thoughts by e-mailing me at johnnyslow@gmail.com.
John Slow
January 1, 2007
Wednesday, October 20, 2004
Minister defends Windfall oil profits and lowest royalities in the world!
The lowest royalities in the world are just not good enough! Let them know at the vote!
ALBERTA ENERGY
Office of the Minister
Responsible for Alberta Energy and Utilities Board
August 19, 2004
07776-06 PIC ODD
John Clark
14815 - 123 Avenue Edmonton, Alberta T5L 2Y7
Dear Mr. Clark:
I have received your letter dated July 18, 2004, and follow-up message through Alberta Connects dated July 22, 2004, regarding oil royalties and production in Alberta.
Alberta's royalty regimes (including oil sands, conventional light and heavy oil, and natural gas) are designed to maximize the benefits of the resource for all Albertans, while reflecting the realities of producing the resource. However, it is important to note that royalty systems vary widely according to the nature of the resource and other considerations such as taxation exemptions, state ownership, and so forth. For example, jurisdictions with offshore resources such as Norway and Alaska face a fundamentally different set of cost and production conditions from onshore jurisdictions such as Alberta. In other words, the average Alaskan oil well that produces 600-700 barrels per day (bpd) will operate under a very different royalty regime compared to the average Alberta oil well that produces less than 30 bpd.
Due to these variations, straight-across comparisons of royalty rates, such as you attempt in your letter, are not very helpful. Instead, many factors must be carefully considered when comparing different royalty regimes. In 2001, a study conducted by Van Meurs & Associates concluded that Alberta's royalty system ranks in the toughest third of over 300 systems examined worldwide. If you wish to purchase a copy of that study, you can reach them through their Web- site at: http:,/,/wv-x;-.vanmeurs.org. For a more local perspective, on my department's Web site, you can find a copy of Oil and Gas Fiscal Regimes of the lYlestern Canadian Provinces and Territories at http://www.energy.gov.ab.ca/com/
Room/Public+Reference/Publications/Publications.htm.
Alberta's oil sands are a resource of incredible magnitude. The 174 billion barrels of Alberta's estimated oil sands reserves is exceeded only by Saudi Arabia's national reserves. However, the magnitude of capital investment required to develop this resource is also immense. Our oil sands royalty regime has been very successful in attracting the necessary investment required. As of July 2004, the department of Economic Development reports there are 69 major oil sands, oil and natural gas projects in Alberta, valued at $2 million or greater, that are planned, underway, or have recently been completed with a total value worth nearly $62 billion.
404 Legislature Building,
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5K 2B6
Telephone 780/427-3740,
Fax 780/422-0195
www.energy.gov.ab.ca
However, oil sands production also involves some of the most capital-intensive projects in the world, requiring hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars of capital investment before a single barrel of oil or bitumen is extracted. As I indicated in my July 6, 2004, letter, these unique circumstances led us to introduce a generic royalty regime for oil sands, based on recommendations from a joint industry /government national task force. As a result, the revenue-less-cost calculation was introduced to formulate oil sands royalties.
The previously-provided information regarding the number of companies in pre- and post-payout status as well as the payments received in the 2003 production year is as specific as possible. The Department of Energy cannot divulge company-specific information on royalty payments for the current fiscal year. Such information is kept confidential (as are personal and corporate income tax information). Province-wide projections for royalty revenues based on forecast production and price of oil and natural gas is publicly available in the annual Budget and is updated quarterly. The First QuarLer Update will be issued within the month and will be available, along with all budget documents on-line at: w-ww.finance.gov.ab.ca.
The information provided electronically to you by my department on July 22, 2004, clearly shows that Albertans are receiving considerable benefits now (over $7.8 billion in royalties and rights fees in 2003/04), benefits that will be even more substantial in the years and decades to come. After all, as you have pointed out, it is part of our responsibility to plan for the long-term benefit of this province.
With regard to your questions on electricity generation and exports, as I have previously indicated, Alberta' Independent System Operator (ISO) is responsible for the operation and planning of Alberta's power system, including interconnections with British Columbia and Saskatchewan. Information regarding generators operating in that market and prices is available through the ISO's Web site at: http://www.aeso.ca/. Alberta does not have a dedicated `export grid'. Alberta producers can export power into other markets at times when Alberta customers do not need that power.
Yours truly,
Murray Smith, MLA
ALBERTA ENERGY
Office of the Minister
Responsible for Alberta Energy and Utilities Board
August 19, 2004
07776-06 PIC ODD
John Clark
14815 - 123 Avenue Edmonton, Alberta T5L 2Y7
Dear Mr. Clark:
I have received your letter dated July 18, 2004, and follow-up message through Alberta Connects dated July 22, 2004, regarding oil royalties and production in Alberta.
Alberta's royalty regimes (including oil sands, conventional light and heavy oil, and natural gas) are designed to maximize the benefits of the resource for all Albertans, while reflecting the realities of producing the resource. However, it is important to note that royalty systems vary widely according to the nature of the resource and other considerations such as taxation exemptions, state ownership, and so forth. For example, jurisdictions with offshore resources such as Norway and Alaska face a fundamentally different set of cost and production conditions from onshore jurisdictions such as Alberta. In other words, the average Alaskan oil well that produces 600-700 barrels per day (bpd) will operate under a very different royalty regime compared to the average Alberta oil well that produces less than 30 bpd.
Due to these variations, straight-across comparisons of royalty rates, such as you attempt in your letter, are not very helpful. Instead, many factors must be carefully considered when comparing different royalty regimes. In 2001, a study conducted by Van Meurs & Associates concluded that Alberta's royalty system ranks in the toughest third of over 300 systems examined worldwide. If you wish to purchase a copy of that study, you can reach them through their Web- site at: http:,/,/wv-x;-.vanmeurs.org. For a more local perspective, on my department's Web site, you can find a copy of Oil and Gas Fiscal Regimes of the lYlestern Canadian Provinces and Territories at http://www.energy.gov.ab.ca/com/
Room/Public+Reference/Publications/Publications.htm.
Alberta's oil sands are a resource of incredible magnitude. The 174 billion barrels of Alberta's estimated oil sands reserves is exceeded only by Saudi Arabia's national reserves. However, the magnitude of capital investment required to develop this resource is also immense. Our oil sands royalty regime has been very successful in attracting the necessary investment required. As of July 2004, the department of Economic Development reports there are 69 major oil sands, oil and natural gas projects in Alberta, valued at $2 million or greater, that are planned, underway, or have recently been completed with a total value worth nearly $62 billion.
404 Legislature Building,
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5K 2B6
Telephone 780/427-3740,
Fax 780/422-0195
www.energy.gov.ab.ca
However, oil sands production also involves some of the most capital-intensive projects in the world, requiring hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars of capital investment before a single barrel of oil or bitumen is extracted. As I indicated in my July 6, 2004, letter, these unique circumstances led us to introduce a generic royalty regime for oil sands, based on recommendations from a joint industry /government national task force. As a result, the revenue-less-cost calculation was introduced to formulate oil sands royalties.
The previously-provided information regarding the number of companies in pre- and post-payout status as well as the payments received in the 2003 production year is as specific as possible. The Department of Energy cannot divulge company-specific information on royalty payments for the current fiscal year. Such information is kept confidential (as are personal and corporate income tax information). Province-wide projections for royalty revenues based on forecast production and price of oil and natural gas is publicly available in the annual Budget and is updated quarterly. The First QuarLer Update will be issued within the month and will be available, along with all budget documents on-line at: w-ww.finance.gov.ab.ca.
The information provided electronically to you by my department on July 22, 2004, clearly shows that Albertans are receiving considerable benefits now (over $7.8 billion in royalties and rights fees in 2003/04), benefits that will be even more substantial in the years and decades to come. After all, as you have pointed out, it is part of our responsibility to plan for the long-term benefit of this province.
With regard to your questions on electricity generation and exports, as I have previously indicated, Alberta' Independent System Operator (ISO) is responsible for the operation and planning of Alberta's power system, including interconnections with British Columbia and Saskatchewan. Information regarding generators operating in that market and prices is available through the ISO's Web site at: http://www.aeso.ca/. Alberta does not have a dedicated `export grid'. Alberta producers can export power into other markets at times when Alberta customers do not need that power.
Yours truly,
Murray Smith, MLA